Group B: http://football-journey.com/
Saturday, May 30, 2015
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Group A opened the championship –
West Germany vs Czechoslovakia, a replay of the 1976 final. The
reigning champions against one of the main favourites, hungry for
revenge. The intrigue was mostly on paper... the fans had better
sense. Only 11 000 attended. The Germans had only one player who
played at the 1976 final – Dietz. Czechoslovakia started with 5 –
Ondrus, Gogh, Jurkemik, Panenka, and Nehoda. The opening ceremony of
the championship quickly proved more interesting than the game. It
was easy to find excuses: the heat, the pressure on the players, the
respect both teams had for foxy opponent. Excuses could not hide the
obvious: the game was extremely dull. Menotti, who was unfortunate to
attend, made the best comment after the match: the ugly football
currently in vogue made him a chain-smoker. He smoked 34 cigarettes
during the match. The strikers of both teams scored 1 goal. The
reigning champions scored nil.
In the 55th minute
Rummenigge scored after a cross from Hansi Muller. That was all and
no wonder: West Germany had only 3 shots at the Czechoslovakian net.
The Czechs – 6. The Germans won, but pleased no one. Czechoslovakia
seemingly played on their current level, which was not much. Venglos
blamed his goalkeeper Netolicka for the goal – it was not a big
mistake, but the coach was right. A bit of hesitation, uncertainty,
lateness and the match was lost. Goalkeeping was well known problem
of the team, though. West Germany was heavily criticized: the team
just looked as a continuation of the failed 1978 version. It seemed
Derwall had no vision of his own, but only followed the approach of
Schon. The tactical scheme was 4-4-2, with 6 defensive players. In
the middle of defense was Culmann: the ever-present Culmann, who was
elevated from a substitute to key player. But he was never more than
reliable substitute – and now even less. Schon reduced West Germany
to dull, physical team of fighters having no clue what to do when
possessing the ball – Derwall's team was the same. Saturated
mid-field with solid runners. Schuster was not fielded at all, Magath
came as a substitute, Hansi Muller once again was found shaky and not
at all at the level of Overath and Netzer. Any thought of comparing
Culmann to Beckenbauer was laughable: not only the man had nothing
to do with conducting the game, but he was a dwarf compared to
Schwarzenbeck. Derwall had no friends after this match, which was
voted the dullest of the whole championship. But the Germans got 2
points.
Holand vs Greece had no intrigue: it
was just a formality. Holland was still considered a leading football
nation – perhaps one reason this match was better attended than
West Germany – Czechoslovakia. The Greeks made funny sounding
statements before the game, which nobody took seriously. The Dutch
started with many little known players, but it was felt that that the
new names are the bright up and coming great Dutch. If not so –
Krol, Haan, Rep, and van de Kerkhof twins were enough to beat Greece.
Alas, it not so. The Greeks were clearly bellow the top teams even
when running on enthusiasm. Unfortunately, Holland did not look
better. They looked like the terrible Germans. Clueless in attack –
the main quality of the great Holland of earlier years was exactly
the attack. After the game Zwartkruis blamed the Greeks for their
ultra-defensive approach. Nobody believed him... Holland had no
creativity and was terrible. They were just lucky: in the 65th
minute the Greek goalkeeper Konstantinou made a stupid foul against
Nanninga. The ball was already in possession of a Greek defender, no
danger, no reason for committing the foul. The referee immediately
gave a penalty.
Konstantinou guessed the direction of
the ball, but was not able to reach it. Kist scored the only goal of
the match. Near the end Kapsis missed a good opportunity. That was
all... Holland was lucky to win. In fact, Holland was lucky not to
lose from incredibly weak opponent. The whole difference between
winning and losing was that: if Konstantinou did not touch Nanninga
and if the header of Kapsis was just a bit lower so to touch the
goalpost at the other side so to go into the net, the winner would
have been Greece.
Holland vs West Germany – the derby
of Group A. The stakes were high – the winner was practically going
to the final. Expectations were also high – West Germany and
Holland had old scores to settle. Both teams disappointed a few days
earlier, but it was felt that the derby will be entirely different.
To a point, West Germany was repeating 1974 – back then the team
also started badly and had to be reshaped in the next games until the
right formula was found. Derwall did the same – Cullmann and Bernd
Foster were out, replaced by Schuster and Hrubesch. Two players is
not much of a change, but only on the surface: the whole structure
was changed. Stielike was moved back as a libero, Schuster got the
role of playmaker – not a pure playmaker like Overath before, but
more like Bonhof: having some defensive role as well. Hrubesch, of
course, was the center-forward. West Germany had immediately
attacking shape – 4-3-3, with 6 attacking players, whereas against
Czechoslovakia there were 6 defensive players. Both Schuster and
Hrubesch were unknown internationally, but what looked like a risk
was well justified: Kaltz and Hrubesch were lethal combination in
Hamburger SV – the burly center-forward scored many a goal after
long cross from Kaltz. Stielike was just right as libero – able to
conduct the game and go ahead. Schuster at first was thought
defensive midfielder, but immediately proved he was much more than
that. He was hungry for success too. Holland had no other option, but
the same players who disappointed against Greece. Five players had
injuries, including Schrijvers, who had to be substituted in the 20th
minute of the previous match – the real Dutch concern was to put
the injured back on their feet. It was done. The game started and
soon it was clear that the German changes worked. Holland, however,
struggled as against the Greeks. The tempo was fast, soon the Germans
clearly controlled the game and started scoring. The hero was Thomas
Allofs, who was very disappointing against Czechoslovakia. He scored
a hat-trick and 10 minutes before the final whistle the winner was
absolutely clear: West Germany 3 – Holland 0.
Great match for Thomas Allofs – here
he scores again and the picture tells it all: Schrijvers is too heavy
for really quick reaction, as he always was, and van de Korput too
late. The Germans were quicker, lighter, brighter. But Derwall made
two substitutes, which were a bit questionable – first, Hansi
Muller was replaced by Magath and in 75th minute Dietz by
19-years old Lothar Matthaus. Hansi Muller perhaps unjustly was
constantly under criticism: he was thought too individualistic and
underperforming. It may have been so, but Magath was no ultimately
better player on one hand, and probably not the right substitute on
the other, for he was doubling Schuster in midfield and the 20-years
old was great. As for Matthaus, he replaced the left full back.
Holland was expected to go 'all or nothing' in the last minutes, so
it was clear that Matthaus must play defensive role, entirely
unfamiliar position. His lack of experience showed quickly – he
committed a foul inside penalty area and Rep made it 1-3. In the 85th
minute Willie van de Kerkhof scored a second goal and things no
longer looked bright for West Germany. To a point, the substitutes
were not right – in the lats part of the match West Germany slowed
down and lost efficiency. But Holland was not capable of miracle –
they were not the team of 1978, far less the great one of 1974. They
attacked to the end, but 5 minutes were just too short a time for
this team. As a whole, West Germany was far better team, showing at
moments sparks of greatness – the Gremans were back, that was the
impression after the game. Holland was gone as a team – that was
the other judgement. They looked just like West Germany in 1978:
tough, constantly running and tackling teams with no clue what to do
when possessing the ball.
Czechoslovakia – Greece attracted no
interest and left almost no trace. It was a match without mystery and
intrigue. The winner was certain. Less than 5000 attended. Venglos
had no illusions – he just said to his team if they wanted to have
a chance to play for the bronze medals, they had to win today. The
difference of class was obvious – Panenka scored in the 6th
minute from a free-kick, his specialty. The Greeks fought back and
equalized 10 minutes later, but it was clear that they were inferior
team by far. Czechoslovakia scored 2 more goals. The team did not
impressed anybody – they were much better than the Greeks, yet,
nothing special. With one match left, only miracle would have placed
the reigning European champions on top of the group. A very huge
miracle... West Germany had to lose to Greece and Czechoslovakia –
win over Holland.
Czechoslvakia – Holland. Before the
match Zwartkruis made grumpy excuses to unfriendly Dutch media: “What
do you expect? The clubs rule – they do not free players for the
national team and as a result we hardly play any friendlies. Without,
say 8 friendlies a year, it is impossible to build good team.”
Venglos was philosopkically-realistic: “It is possible to not lose
to Holland, they are not better than us. If we are lucky to reach the
'small final' for third place our goal will be accomplished.” He
fielded his usual starters, bringing back Netolicka, who did not play
against Greece. Goalkeeping was well known problem without solution
– Netolicka was not great, Seman was similar, Netolicka was back.
The rest were the best Czechoslovakia had at the moment. Berger was
out – he was substituted in the 23rd minute against
Greece, which was enough indication for his worth – and Vojacek was
the only new starter. Masny was moved back to midfield – defense
and caution was the order of the day: 4-4-3 scheme, with 5 defensive
players, for Vojacek was nominal midfielder. Zwartkruis tried to
shake his team, which was difficult, given the squad he had. Haan was
out. Kist was out. Nanninga, the golden substitute in 1978, was a
starter. The changes were pathetic... Nanninga was used so far like
in 1978 – a substitute, coming in the second half in the hope of
making a miracle. Did not work. Nanninga was not a star, but rather
ordinary player. For more Zwartkruis had no guts: it was obvious that
van de Kerkhof twins are counter-productive. But they are constant
starters. Rep was obviously beyond his peak, yet a starter. The
tactical scheme was clearly defensive: 4-4-2, with Rene van de
Kerkhof in front. He was more of a midfielder than a striker. Both
opponents were seemingly going for a tie. The match was ugly and
brutal – 52 fouls were called. Both teams managed to score a goal.
Zwartkruis decision to start without Haan, but to depend on van de
Kerkhof twins was obvious mistake – when Haan replaced Nanninga,
Holland became more creative and dangerous. And managed to equalize.
The match ended 1-1 – the result both sides seemingly aimed at, but
Czechoslovakia benefited by it.
Vojacek clears the ball addressed to
Haan. Ondrus watches nearby – the original scheme, in which Vojacek
was placed as midfielder, fooled no one: he was a central defender.
His real position. Zwartkruis said “we did what we can” - which
was not much. Venglos again was 'realistic': “The game was not a
question of beauty, but getting a particular result. We got it, we
are happy.” Menotti was disgusted and one again criticized
defensive European football.
The last group match – West Germany
vs Greece – was mere protocol. Both teams made changes, giving some
playing time to unused reserves. Derwall clearly kept some players
fresh for the final. Cullmann was back – this time in midfield.
Memmering got completed the line. Schuster, Dietz, and Allofs were
out. Like the opening match, the scheme was 4-4-2. The Germans were
not even interested and they appeared as arbitrary bunch of players
some of which don't want to play, and some don't know how to play.
The only important thing was the weird insistence of Derwall to use
Cullmann – this time combined with Stielike. Why woody Cullmann,
who was not even at his usual form? The Greeks were even less than
usual, for some of the key players were replaced by the unused
reserves. The team played as best as they could. West Germans walked
and aimlessly kicked the ball around. Nobody scored. And who would
expect a miracle of this match? Under the old rules, the match was
not played at the same time Czechoslovakia and Holland played, but
after. Derwall was crystal clear: “Who will start depends on the
result of the other match. If it is tied, then Dietz, Schuster, and
Allofs will get a rest.”. This match did not matter at all – even
if they lost it, the Germans were finalists. The Greeks had a chance
to win the match in the last minutes, but the ball deflected from the
cross bar out. Panagoulias was happy and boisterous: 'We are the
moral winners, we are proud. Europe will hear from us yet.' It did...
24 years later. True, the Greek team showed spirit and managed a tie
against mighty West Germany, but it was absolutely clear that they
are inferior to any other finalist. During the finals their only
noticeable player relatively equal to the leading Europeans was
Anastopoulos.
A double-edged picture: Rummenigge high
above Greek defender, who is unable even to challenge. That was the
objective difference of class between the Greeks and the leading
European football nations. In the same time, Rummenigge and his
teammates were unable to beat Greece. Rummenigge himself was
substituted in the 65th minute by Del'Haye.
The final table of Group A:
- West Germany 2 1 0 4-2 5
- Czechoslovakia 1 1 1 4-3 3
- Holland 1 1 1 4-4 3
- Greece 0 1 2 1-4 1
West Germany once again going to the
final – third time consecutive European finalist. Czechoslovakia, a
bit surprisingly, was going to play for bronze – a success in
itself, and also brave performance, for the champions of 1976 were
not at all at their previous level. Holland – major disappointment
and an end of an era, recognized by their own coach. Greece –
nothing special, except that they reached the final stage. Success
for the country, but obviously Greek football was still far behind
the leading nations.
Monday, May 25, 2015
Saturday, May 23, 2015
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
Monday, May 18, 2015
Saturday, May 16, 2015
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Czechoslovakia nobody counted. They
were the reigning European champions, though – and because of that
there was interest and inevitable evaluations of the current team
compared to the one of 1976. Czechoslovakia followed curious path of
highs and lows: after the 1970 World Cup there was sharp decline,
then they soared and won the European championship in 1976, then
missed the 1978 World Cup, and again moved up to the 1980 European
finals. In a way, Czechoslovakia was in the same difficult situation
West Germany was after winning the 1974 World Cup – the winners
aged, and were replaced by players almost of their generation, who
were already established at the time of triumph, but were inferior to
the stars. Second-stringers, who never reached the class of the
champions, but were the top players when the champions started their
exit. West Germany was not great with the second-stringers and
similarly Czechoslovakia was not. Both countries did not make radical
coaching changes either – Derwall was uprgraded from assistant to
head coach when Schon stepped down in 1978. In the same year Jozef
Venglos replaced Vaclav Jezek, whose assistant he was since 1973.
Like Derwall, Venglos did not introduce
radical changes, but fiddled with the same players Jezek used,
continued the same tactics and training methods, and carefully called
new players now and then. And like Derwall, Venglos moved to new
options only when there was no choice because of retirement or heavy
injury. The only difference between West Germany and Czechoslovakia
was that the Germans faced the problem earlier – in 1980 was more
or less West Germany of 1975-78. They had the most of the 1976
champions at hand, but it was not the same team and hardly made any
news. Opinions were almost uniform: Czechoslovakia had no chance.
Venglos himself said so. Czechoslovakian media too: 'the same
players, only 4 years older' was the judgment. People like Ruud Krol,
who considered Czechoslovakia strong and dangerous were tiny minority
and were not taken seriously. Reality was speaking loudly: there were
no new exciting talent in Czechoslovakia. The best players were still
the 1976 European champions and those,who were not able to make the
national team back then. Venglos tried the same approach used in 1976
– a long, secluded training camp and many friendly matches against
various not so great opponents. Like before, results were not great,
which, like before, assured most observers that Czechoslovakia is not
strong indeed. That was costly mistake in 1976. And just like before,
the rather big group of players was trimmed to the final list.
1
|
1GK
|
Jaroslav
Netolička |
(1954-03-03)3 March 1954 (aged 26) |
11
|
Dukla
Prague |
2
|
2DF
|
Jozef
Barmoš |
(1954-08-28)28 August 1954 (aged 25) |
28
|
Inter
Bratislava |
3
|
2DF
|
Ladislav
Jurkemik |
(1953-07-20)20 July 1953 (aged 26) |
31
|
Inter
Bratislava |
4
|
2DF
|
Anton
Ondruš (c) |
(1950-03-27)27 March 1950 (aged 30) |
54
|
Slovan
Bratislava |
5
|
2DF
|
Koloman
Gögh |
(1948-01-07)7 January 1948 (aged 32) |
51
|
Slovan
Bratislava |
6
|
2DF
|
František
Štambachr |
(1953-02-13)13 February 1953 (aged 27) |
15
|
Dukla
Prague |
7
|
3MF
|
Ján
Kozák |
(1954-04-17)17 April 1954 (aged 26) |
34
|
Lokomotiva
Košice |
8
|
3MF
|
Antonín
Panenka |
(1948-12-02)2 December 1948 (aged 31) |
43
|
Bohemians
Praha |
9
|
4FW
|
Miroslav
Gajdůšek |
(1951-09-20)20 September 1951 (aged 28) |
45
|
Dukla
Prague |
10
|
4FW
|
Marián
Masný |
(1950-08-13)13 August 1950 (aged 29) |
57
|
Slovan
Bratislava |
11
|
4FW
|
Zdeněk
Nehoda |
(1952-05-09)9 May 1952 (aged 28) |
64
|
Dukla
Prague |
12
|
2DF
|
Rostislav
Vojáček |
(1949-02-23)23 February 1949 (aged 31) |
24
|
Baník
Ostrava |
13
|
3MF
|
Werner
Lička |
(1954-02-15)15 February 1954 (aged 26) |
2
|
Baník
Ostrava |
14
|
2DF
|
Jan
Fiala |
(1956-05-19)19 May 1956 (aged 24) |
12
|
Dukla
Prague |
15
|
4FW
|
Ladislav
Vízek |
(1955-01-22)22 January 1955 (aged 25) |
15
|
Dukla
Prague |
16
|
2DF
|
Oldřich
Rott |
(1951-05-26)26 May 1951 (aged 29) |
3
|
Dukla
Prague |
17
|
3MF
|
Jaroslav
Pollák |
(1947-07-11)11 July 1947 (aged 32) |
49
|
Sparta
Prague |
18
|
3MF
|
Jan
Berger |
(1955-11-27)27 November 1955 (aged 24) |
1
|
Dukla
Prague |
19
|
2DF
|
Karol
Dobiaš |
(1947-12-18)18 December 1947 (aged 32) |
67
|
Bohemians
Prague |
20
|
3MF
|
Petr
Němec |
(1957-06-07)7 June 1957 (aged 23) |
0
|
Baník
Ostrava |
21
|
1GK
|
Stanislav
Seman |
(1952-08-08)8 August 1952 (aged 27) |
1
|
Lokomotiva
Košice |
22
|
1GK
|
Dušan
Kéketi |
(1951-03-24)24 March 1951 (aged 29) |
7
|
Spartak
Trnava |
Top row, from left: Ruzicka –
masseur, Nehoda, Netolicka, Ondrus, Seman, Janecka, Kundrat – team
doctor.
Middle row: Masny, Jurkemik, ?, Venglos
– coach, Gogh, Radimec, Brumovsky – assistant coach.
First row: Vizek, Vojacek, Fiala,
Gajdusek, Panenka, Barmos.
This is partial version of the squad
called to the training camp and there is a bit of lesson in it:
Janecka and Radimec did not make the final team. Both will be key
players of the national team in the first half of the 1980s. 10
players from the 1976 team were selected. Most of the rest were well
known already in 1976, some with many caps, but they were the second
stringers: those, who did not make the champion squad, who were not
fully trusted back then. Four years later they were no better for
sure – some were already old (Vojacek – 31, Gajdusek – 28, Rott
– newcomer to the team at 29). Frantisek Stambachr, 27, was of the
same ilk – he was part of the 1976 squad, but deep reserve not
expected to play at all. By now he had only 15 caps. The team had
huge problem, readily admitted by Venglos – goalkeeping. This was
the last and may be the most telling similarity with West Germany
after 1974: after Ivo Viktor, who retired, there was nobody. The same
was in West Germany – Sepp Maier played 'forever' and his
contemporaries were doomed (Nigbur, Cleff, Franke). When Maier
stepped down, they were too old too – and there was nobody else.
The back-up of Ivo Viktor shared the fate of the German keepers: he
was of similar age and when Viktor retired Alexander Vencel was
already at the end of his career, playing his last days for a small
club. There was nobody else... Once upon a time promising players
aged in the dark shadow of the great goalkeeper and never really
developed their potential: back in 1971-72 Dusan Keketi was young,
bright talent, expected to become really strong keeper with time. By
1980 he was 29 years old with 7 matches for the national team and
still third choice. Other keepers were tried during and especially
after Viktor and none satisfied. There was no firm starter. Venglos
settled for Netolicka perhaps because he had many years ahead of him
to play and was part of the strong at the time Dukla (Prague) team.
But he was no better than his reserves, not even than those who also
played for the national team, but were not selected this time –
Michalik (Banik Ostrava) and Hruska (Bohemians Prague). Stanislav
Seman, the 2nd goalie, had played for the national team
only once so far... Venglos had no way of finding solution, honestly
acknowledged the problem, and blamed his keeper eventually for costly
mistake. And at the end the last similarity with West Germany, this
one at the same time: Bonhof got injury too late to be replaced and
the Germans went to Italy with 21 players. Czechoslovakia went with
only 19. Dobias was unable to restore his form after injury and was
left home. Nemec and Rott were also found out of shape too late and
dropped. But the squads were already deposited and there was no way
to make changes. Two champions of 1976 did not make the squad at all
– Svehlik and Bicovsky. One may wonder what would have been the
fate of West Germany, if Bonhof was fit and the team was shaped
around him. The same wonder what if Dobias, Svehlik, and Bicovsky
were at hand for Czechoslovakia. Very likely the results were not to
be good, for with these players both teams would be firmly based on
the old approach, which lead to failure. Failure was not in the books
for the Czechoslovaks, though: they were considered too weak already
by everybody, including their coach. Realistically, third in Group A.
Happy to be at the finals, nothing more.
Monday, May 11, 2015
Saturday, May 9, 2015
Monday, May 4, 2015
Saturday, May 2, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)